Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Message icon:


shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Topic Summary

Posted by: hsei
« on: February 17, 2013, 18:25:09 »

The mentioned article adresses most of the questions concerning quality. But be careful with the data displayed in the analysis columns: Clipping e.g. introduces considerably (false) high frequency contributions. Thus overamplified material seems to be better with respect to max. frequency compared to correctly sampled ones. Even the spectrograms look better, but quality isn't.
Posted by: Admin
« on: February 17, 2013, 17:11:10 »

Do you read this article ( ?
Posted by: tokyojef
« on: February 17, 2013, 08:00:59 »


Can someone summarize :

1. the RATING bar and what it processes to determine the result, and its usefulness.

2. the CLIPPING bar (it seems to red line at 100)- what is the point at which the clipping number is beyond keeping the file?

3. the mean and max ABS- what are these?

I haven't been able to find anything in my searches to answer these yet...
Thanks! Jeff :)