Author Topic: Other Comparison Criteria  (Read 27782 times)

hsei

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
    • View Profile
Other Comparison Criteria
« Reply #135 on: July 13, 2010, 10:29:33 »
SNR feature could be extended:
Quality measure by frequency (band) content.
Rather often potentially high quality recordings (e.g. 192 KBit/s MP3) turn out to be just recompressions of e.g. 128 kBit/s material. Of course frequencies (or other details) lost at previous compressions can't be regained by that.

But besides that: This software is rather helpful since it does local comparison on a track to track basis and doesn't rely on a server database with entries of acoustic fingerprint vs. tags.

Admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 664
    • View Profile
    • https://www.smilarityapp.com
Other Comparison Criteria
« Reply #136 on: July 13, 2010, 19:28:38 »
yes, yes we planning add audio testing mechanics.
But first we need complete and finish current state of program:
1) test and complete p2p tagging algorithm (we work on it now)
2) solve problems with some stupid DirectShow filters (what crashes everythere)
3) write help, tutorial
4) introduce premium subscription (writing Similarity very time/resource consuming)