Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ektorbarajas

Pages: 1 2 [3]
31
Wishlist / Re: Display filename first instead of path, for Results
« on: March 19, 2014, 16:21:23 »
Hi.

The post for the beta 1.9.1 does not mention anything about those new fields "Filename", "Folder", "Extension"

I'm currently working with a huge amount of mp3 files (50,000+) and the current stable version is not practival for me, it has found 1000+ duplicates and since I'm only able to see the full path and then the filename I'm not able to work fast on selecting the files to delete.

Thanks

32
Wishlist / Re: Display filename first instead of path, for Results
« on: March 18, 2014, 23:24:39 »
Is this available for the current stable version? Or for the beta? And in case it's for the beta. What is the ETA?
Thanks

33
Wishlist / Display filename first instead of path, for Results
« on: March 18, 2014, 23:05:50 »
Hi.

I think it's needed to implement this feature ASAP, specially when working with huge collections that results in 1000+ audio duplicates.

Similaity displays on the "file" column the whole path and then the filename, this is not practical and not functional at all. Since what a user is looking for is to check the filename for easier identification, not the path.

Please improve this and allow the option to display first the filename and then the path, perhaps as two different columns instead of just one, for example "filename" one column and "path" the other column.

Regards

34
Wishlist / Re: Estimate time of completion?
« on: March 18, 2014, 23:00:58 »
Hi. is this feature coming for a future version?

35
 ;D great

36
Wishlist / Re: Estimate time of completion?
« on: November 04, 2013, 14:42:43 »
Hope that this gets implemented, would be great when processing a large amount of file to at least know an estimate time  ;)

37
Great!!!

Kind regards

38
Wishlist / Estimate time of completion?
« on: October 31, 2013, 21:57:12 »
I have being wondering this. why does an estimate time of completion has not being implemented?

I'm aware that a precise or exact time could not be given, but based on the number of files, calculations, processing power, etc. an estimate time of completion could be obtained.

Have the developers ever considered this?

Regards

39
Any update about this request? perhaps with the beta and the upcoming official release?

40
Hi. It has being a long time  :)

Just wanted to know if this minor issue has being corrected in the beta 1.9.0?

Regards

41
Hi.

I've noticed that the red font sometimes is difficult to see, perhaps it would be great to add an option to choose how to highlight marked files, for example give options to make the fonts bold, or change the color or choose a text highlight color.

Regards

42
So the rule of thumb is that if a benchmark throws the OpenCL speed lower than 1 CPU cure, then OpenCL should be used?

For example:

CPU Speed (1 Core): 281ms
OpenCL Device Speed: 78ms

menas that there is a real benefit enabilg OpenCL

While

CPU Speed (1 Core): 581ms
OpenCL Device Speed: 754ms

means that OpenCL MUST NOT BE enabled?

Then indeed the help statement is wrong:
"Don’t turn on OpenCL acceleration if the results of OpenCL benchmark are lower than processor’s benchmark, because this will increase overhead costs due to increased expenses for data transfer to the OpenCL device. "

Regards



43
Also I'd appreciate to clarify this:

On the parameter "Work Group Size", higher numbers are better? so if a device supports 1024 then it's better 1024 than 64?

Thanks

44
Hi.

I noticed that when running an OpenCL benchmark, the results are expressed in speed (ms) for example:

CPU Speed (1 Core): 281ms
OpenCL Device Speed: 78ms

According to this, then OpenCL must be enabled since openCL is faster than 1 CPU Core,

BUT the online help says the opposite:
"Don’t turn on OpenCL acceleration if the results of OpenCL benchmark are lower than processor’s benchmark, because this will increase overhead costs due to increased expenses for data transfer to the OpenCL device. "

So what is the correct statement?
Thanks

45
Bugs / "update is available" message when there is no update?
« on: March 14, 2013, 22:46:21 »
Hi.

I've the latest version installed: 1.8.3 (x64) build 1663 (06/03/2013)

And I don't know why every time I start the program the pop up window saying "update is available" appears.

I've even tried to re-download the 64 bit installer and installed again but the issue is still there.

Is this a bug? or perhaps indeed there is an update but the installer is not the most recent?

Thanks

Pages: 1 2 [3]